Feoffee accounts for 1766 to 1866

The following entries appear in page 145 of the Feoffee accounts for 1766 to 1866 .
Use the box to the right to move to another page within this book

Go to: page:
or:  year:
Date Name Type Description Amount (£ s d)   Building link
22/12/1794   The following names are headed Tathall End I will enter TE after the names 0 - 00 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Geary support TE 0 - 06 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Widow Mills support TE 0 - 04 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 James Herbert support TE Junior 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Key support TE 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Robert Maikins support TE 0 - 05 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 John Kingstone support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Frost support TE 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Widow Ange support TE 0 - 05 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Herbert support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Jacob Herbert support TE 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Mary Pain support TE 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Nicholls support TE 0 - 06 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Tebbett support TE 0 - 04 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 John Pain support TE 0 - 02 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Benjamyn Mills support TE 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Latimore support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Widow Kingstone support TE 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Kingstone support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794   The following names are headed Bullington End I will enter BE after the names 0 - 00 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 John Bates support BE 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Daniell Gostelow support BE 0 - 07 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Aris support BE 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Widow Aris support BE 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Widow Tebbett support BE 0 - 04 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 John Aris support BE 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Widow Nicholls support BE 0 - 04 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Caves support BE 0 - 04 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Denton support BE 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794   The following names are headed Malt Mill Lane and Green End I will enter MM after the names 0 - 00 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Adkins support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Mills support MM 0 - 05 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Thomas Surrage support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Marriott support MM 0 - 06 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Benjamyn Stoneton support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 James Inwood support MM 0 - 02 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 George Chuckley support MM 0 - 05 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 William Smith support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Smith support MM Son ill 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Joseph Nicholls support MM 0 - 06 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Samuell Clifton support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Jethro Inwood support MM 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 William Stoneton support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Stoneton support MM Soldier 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 William Fawson, widow support MM William Fawson's Widow 0 - 04 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 John Cooke support MM 0 - 04 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 William Soulbry support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Warrick Stoneton support MM Warrick Stoneton's Wife 0 - 03 - 06  
none
22/12/1794 Matthew Smith support MM 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 John Scott support MM 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 Pinfold support MM Pinfold's Daughter 0 - 03 - 00  
none
22/12/1794 James Travell support MM 0 - 02 - 06  
none
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
Notes:  
  The Feoffee was a charity which owned several properties and provide aid to the poor from the income derived from these properties. Two Feoffee ledgers survive for the period 1766 to 1866. They record only payments. During this period, it appears that the Feoffee owned Stafford House and was running it as a work house. The payment are of two types: - support payments to beneficiaries, occasionally with a brief explanation of why the support was needed - payments for services or taxes, usually connected with the maintenance of feoffee properties, sometimes with an indication of the work Most of the support payments are made in the winter months, presumably because there was insufficient agricultural work to provide employment for everyone in these months.